(Sorry about the weird formatting)
For me, the ending of Salinger's short story "Teddy" came across as an unexpected shock. Even if the reader had picked up on earlier hints dropped by Teddy, I don't think that many people fully expected the story to end in the way it did.
But going off that, how does the story end?
Upon first glance, it seems that Teddy dies. For one, Teddy hints that something important "will either happen today or February 14, 1958 when I am sixteen." This 'thing' becomes clearer later in the story, as Teddy (oddly) explains in great detail a hypothetical situation where he dies.
"I have a swimming lesson in about five minutes. I could go downstairs to the pool, and there might not be any water in it. This might be the day they change the water or something. What might happen, though, I might walk up to the edge of it, just to have a look at the bottom, for instance, and my sister might come up and sort of push me in. I could fracture my skull and die instantaneously."
And in that famous, ambigious closing scene, we hear piercing screams from the pool, "clearly coming from a small, female child." This seems to suggest that a) Teddy and his sister are indeed at their swimming lesson, and b) something horrifying has happened.
If we as readers believe that Teddy is truly a spiritual genius who can outsmart professors at institutions around the world, then perhaps this whole situation is more believable. Maybe Teddy can truly predict his death.
But even if we accept this ending, it raises a few, important questions. For one, is it possible that Booper murders Teddy? If Teddy knows that he's about to die why doesn't he try and stop it?
Both are sinister and chilling to think about. Maybe Booper and Teddy's relationship is more strained than just a "sibling rivalry". Or maybe Booper is truly evil. If we believe Teddy's intellegence is real, then it really isn't a far stretch to consider that Booper is a malicious child. Or heck, maybe Booper was just predetermined to kill Teddy when she was born. As for why Teddy does not try to avoid his inevitable death, it makes the most sense to assume that he believes that death—and dying, is not a big deal. He truly thinks he will be reincarnated again.
Another explanation of the last scene is that Teddy commits suicide.
From this point of view, we regard Teddy's genius with skepticism. After all, what ten-year old truly behaves like Teddy? Perhaps Teddy is actually a very mentally disoriented child, who has conjured a whole different world in his head. If we consider the people around Teddy—his parents, Bob, and Booper—they all seem much more different and removed.
Early on in the story, Teddy complains that he was only reincarnated as an American because he could not stay focused while meditating in his earlier life. Based on this detail, it would make sense for Teddy to be frustrated and even feel trapped in his current situation. Perhaps Teddy jumps into the empty pool himself in an attempt to escape from the confinements of his American life.
One last possibility to consider is that Booper is the one who dies (I didn't consider this until someone brought it up in class). It depends how closely you want to read into the text, but the last paragraph states that the piercing female scream seems to "reverberate within the four tiled walls." Maybe Salinger literally means "within"—that Booper screams as she falls into the empty pool.
There's no doubt that Salinger keeps the ending very ambiguous. A few of his other short stories have ended similarly, causing the reader to ponder (at times, with great frustration) what has actually happened, and what will happen.
How do you guys read the ending of "Teddy"?
I really like the question of, if Teddy dies and predicted it accurately, why doesn't he try to stop it? I like the way you phrase the idea of him believing so deeply in reincarnation that death is not a big deal. That idea takes my mind to this really pleasant place where this 10 year old finally gets out of the reincarnation cycle and is chilling in an enlightened afterlife and he's like eating cheese and crackers and discussing his past lives with a bunch of old also enlightened people. I really like that concept, so I think that's the ending I'm gonna roll with.
ReplyDeleteYeah, initially, I thought something had happened to Booper, not Teddy. But during the class discussion, I realized that there's way more evidence for Teddy's death than hers (for example, like you said, his odd remark about something happening today or when he's 16). I guess that if he does see things as predetermined, even if he wanted to (which he probably isn't), he couldn't escape his death. Accepting things for how they are and not trying to avoid/outsmart/whatever them seems to be a theme (in this story and also Buddhism, if a quick Google search is accurate enough).
ReplyDeleteWhen I read the the ending and the description of the scream as "clearly coming from a small, female child," I thought it was Booper who died. There is the foreshadowing of Teddy's hypothesis that Booper could push him into an empty pool and that makes me suspicious that he pushed Booper in. Both sides of the argument of who actually died are plausible, but I like that Salinger leaves the ending very open to interpretation.
ReplyDeleteI thought that Teddy died and predicted his death accurately. However, the more I think about it, the more I wonder if anyone died at all. Because none of Salinger's other stories are really mystical or magical, and so it would be kinda shocking for me if Teddy really could predict the future (after all, the scholars are just testing him & their findings are unconfirmed, and how would Teddy know the pool is drained etc?). So maybe Booper and Teddy are just playing in the pool during the lesson.
ReplyDeleteI have been assuming that Teddy did die at the end of the story and that he did accurately predict his own death. I had thought about some of the other possibilities, like the it was Booper who died, and thought that these seemed less likely and there was less evidence early in the story to point to these endings. I think that it would be reasonable, if we assume that Teddy was capable of predicting his own death and that he had the beliefs about reincarnation that he laid out, that if he knew he was going to die he would not try to stop it. I still think that this ending makes the most sense, but I liked that you thought through some of the other possibilities for this ending that definitely leaves it open to interpretation.
ReplyDeleteI interpreted the scream to mean that Teddy died since it seemed like the most apparent answer. Given how ambiguous Salinger is though, it's definitely up for debate as to what exactly happened. Teddy's seemingly psychic knowledge hints at predetermination or predestination, especially his beliefs of reincarnation, but what's revealed to us isn't described enough to be completely understandable. However, it's equally plausible that he has a mental condition and it was a strange coincidence. The openness of the ending allows for great discussion, so no complaints here.
ReplyDeleteI don't really think that Teddy died at the end of the story. Throughout the story Teddy is deeply philosophical regarding life and how we perceive it. In my opinion the scream at the end of the story is more directed at the reader rather than tell what happened, It kinda makes an ultimatum that either you believe that Teddy died or that the story will continue, leaving us in suspense and forcing the reader to ponder what Teddy said prior. Great Post!
ReplyDeleteYou're right that Booper comes across as pretty evil in the one scene in which we see her, but even if it is her scream at the end, having pushed her brother into the empty pool, I think the implication would be that she meant to push him into the pool (seems like a very Booper thing to do), but that she'd assumed it was filled? To suggest that she "murders" him intentionally might be going too far (although she is rather nasty to Myron earlier). I have no idea why the ship would suddenly drain the pool, when there are swimming lessons planned, though. And would she really not be able to see that it was empty? Perhaps, if all she saw was her brother standing at the edge, just daring her to push . . .
ReplyDelete