In Wide Sargasso Sea, one detail that keeps popping up is the cock/rooster crowing. In one instance, Antoinette seems to specifically state that the rooster’s call impends betrayal. “But who is the traitor?” she questions. It becomes clear that the traitor in that instance is Amelie, who betrays Antoinette and sleeps with Rochester. Their encounter is arguably the last straw for Antoinette, who immediately leaves to meet Christophine. Later, after Antoinette's return, she grills Rochester over the affair, telling him that he’s no better than the old slave owners.
I was also curious to see whether the rooster’s crow signaled impending doom in other parts of the novel. Shortly after Antoinette and Rochester arrive in the island, Rochester mentions how he had to listen to “cocks crow all night”. As they explore the landscape the next day, Rochester feels uncomfortable, overwhelmed by the size and color; “too much blue, too much purple, too much green”. But perhaps the most telling is Rochester’s reaction to their temporary house, calling it “more awkward than ugly, a little sad as if it knew it could not last”. Here, we are provided with an ominous reference to Antoinette and Rochester’s eventual fate. In addition, the cocks crowing every night seem to strengthen this idea that from the start, their relationship would end in some sort of betrayal.
The last instance of the rooster’s call seems to be the most chilling. By this point in the novel, Rochester has transformed into a near madman-- to destroy Antoniette, he plans to take her back to Jamaica, and then England. He begins to write a letter to the lawyers in Spanish Town, requesting to rent a large house with separate suites, and servants who he would pay very liberally if they keep quiet about Antionette. The entire time that Rochester writes the letter, a cock crows persistently outside. Rochester is clearly annoyed and even throws a book at the animal, but the cock just moves further away and begins to crow again. This seems to indicate Rochester’s final--and worst-- betrayal: taking Antoinette away from the places she so dearly loves.
Upon further research, I also discovered that the image of a crowing cock is often used in literature as a symbol of Peter’s betrayal of Christ: “I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me’, (the Bible, Luke 22:33). Thus, it makes a lot of sense how Rhys employed this image in her novel. Although there’s a feeling of unease throughout the entire novel, I think the crowing cock image was interesting to explore. We mentioned in class (earlier in the book, before Rochester goes crazy) that there might be a sliver of hope for Antoinette and Rochester’s relationship. There’s no denying that there are a few scarce moments of tenderness: when he buries his face in her hair, or admires her white dress. But I feel as if the rooster really drives home the point that despite these moments, Rochester and Antoinette were doomed from the moment they arrived in the islands.
It's really insightful of you to note the presence of a crow whenever the story takes a turn for the worse. I remembered the crows at the beginning of Antoinette's and Rochester's honeymoon, and noting how odd it was that they had called throughout the night, but I never explored why they were important and necessary for the novel. Your post does well in explaining their importance. I wonder if the writers of the screenplay also caught these details. Great work!
ReplyDeleteI never noticed this until you pointed it out! :0 Thanks for bringing this to my attention! So interesting. Now that I've read this, I definitely can see how the rooster symbolizes betrayal.
ReplyDeleteIt's very interesting to see how biblical allusions are peppered throughout literature, and I never would have gotten the crow as an allusion without this post
ReplyDeleteYeah, like everyone else, I didn't really pay that much attention to the rooster's calls. They were there, but I didn't take care to try and understand their meaning. With the biblical allusion, does that mean Rhys clearly intends for us to see Rochester as Peter (basically a bad person)? And one thing about your post that I'm unsure about, is why the traitor is Amelie rather than Rochester. Antoinette and Amelie don't get along and are pretty rude to each other (e.g. "white cockroach"), so would it really be a betrayal of anything if Amelie slept with Rochester? On the other hand, Antoinette loves (loved) Rochester, and so if he slept with Amelie, that'd be more of a betrayal, right?
ReplyDeleteEven if you don't get along with someone, it'd still be a betrayal to sleep with her husband. However, I agree that Rochester seems more the traitor here, especially right after he and Antoinette have just had this pretty meaningful conversation where Antoinette thinks he loves her. (And his narration basically tells us "yeah I was trying to betray Antoinette")
DeleteThis is a really interesting post Lindsay! I think the theme of time and repetition is really important to this novel; and this is something that the rooster crowing symbolizes. Antoinette's fate is bizarrely related to her mother's--she too ends up imprisoned in a large estate by her husband--and the foreshadowing and inevitability throughout the novel are emphasized by the repeated reference to the progression of time.
ReplyDelete